Commander one vs. path finder software#
Commander one vs. path finder plus#
Commander one vs. path finder mac#

If you’re looking to completely replace the Finder, I think Path Finder does a much better job. Almost all of Commander One’s features suffer from this same problem. So launching an app like CyberDuck or Transmit to use FTP services is no different than using Commander One exclusively, really. Commander One is a separate app that doesn’t integrate with the Finder, or replace it.

Commander one vs. path finder mac#

Mac Finder integration is keyĪnd that’s really the problem here. I have two other FTP apps installed, and both work flawlessly with my FTP sites.

Eltima offered to troubleshoot the problem for me, but I didn’t go through with it because FTP is such a basic thing that I shouldn’t have to-it’s an ftp address, a username and a password.

Unfortunately, I couldn’t get the FTP management feature to work with my FTP sites at all.

Commander one vs. path finder software#

An app that exists to replace the Finder needs to improve the Finder, not remove great features.įor simple tasks like dual-pane Finder windows, adding global hotkeys, adding legacy-style Finder labels, theming Finder windows, adding a button to view invisible files, auto-resize windows to specific sizes (or just enough to fit file names on the fly) and adding a host of other tweaks and enhancements to the Mac’s standard Finder, I use the excellent XtraFinder app, which has the benefit of being free though it does require disabling Apple’s SIP (System Integrity Protection) to do so a problem that brought about headaches for many software developers with the arrival of El Capitan, and ultimately killed the popular Total Finder, a Commander One competitor.Ĭommander One’s hero feature, an integrated FTP manager, sounds like the one feature that would make Commander One worth paying for. You actually have to click a button in the toolbar.

For instance, simply hitting the Space bar in Commander One doesn’t invoke Quick Look like it does in the Finder. In my opinion, the entire app feels cobbled together and lacking in polish. Unfortunately, none of the features found in Commander One work as well as they do in other apps. I gave Commander One a test run for the last two weeks and compiled my thoughts below. I won’t go into all the features, you can read about them on the website. But if you do need it, the concept of having FTP built-in to Finder windows is certainly enticing.Īlong with it’s marquee FTP feature, Commander One offers the ability to theme it’s file manager window, access a Processes window (similar to Apple’s own Activity Monitor), a built-in Terminal, various file sorting capabilities, integration with Dropbox and more. In fact, other than web developers, I suspect there are few people who need FTP anymore, or even know what it is. The need for an FTP Manager today is rather limited. The biggest feature of Commander One is the built-in FTP file manager.

Commander one vs. path finder plus#

But Commander One promises to offer Path Finder-level features, plus a built-in FTP manager, at an affordable price through the Mac App Store-where you have the luxury of installing it on five Macs at a time. This is nothing new XtraFinder does this to some extent, and and Path Finder have done these things for years. It simply recreates Finder windows and adds a multitude of tweaks and features to them. After looking at the feature list of Commander One, I immediately wondered if it could possibly deliver on the promises it made.Ĭommander One is what you would call a Finder Enhancement app. When I decided to take a look at Commander One, I did so with the expectation that I was going to be looking at something that was equal to or better than apps I was already familiar with and/or used on a regular basis-such as XtraFinder, Path Finder, Transmit, etc.